My brief and belated notes from the Higher Education Teaching and Learning conference (HETL) 2014 conference, Anchorage

Chair HETL – John Anchan (Canada)

Organiser and CEO – Patrick Blessinger
patrickblessinger@gmail.com
http://www.hetl.org

Some notes from the workshop presenters:

Nancy Hensel
– is a priority for online to be ‘cost effective’ or can it be about taking topics in-situ, given that we are to be concerned w the total experience
– prof support needed for staff teaching online (if we want staff to be engaging)
– how do we have the conversation about educational purpose?
– whose doing interesting things w technology? Grounded and bottom up..
– where is the generative dialogue?

Robin Melton
– app-ologist
– need to make use of technology
– device powered learning
http://www.TBRMobile.org
– purpose vs technologies (technologically enabling?)
– BYOD (bring your own device)

Danny Birchall
– key role of HE today is to ‘curate’ sd’s lng

Hash # sites
#hetl2014
#deakinmooc
#epistemologicallycommitted
#learningcuration
#highered
#walkthetalk
#classtogo
#blackboard
#wanttolearn
#bestpractices

@ sites
@nearpod – recommended we explore
@peardeck
@socratic
@myclassflow
@dyknow

Someone said
– sds need to see us using IT tools
– heutagogy is ‘life for life’

Richard Martin
– rc.martin@winnipeg.ca
– unesco pillars
– service projects as experiential learning for undergrad sds

apps
– learn to STORIFY todays experiences, then curate for all. Eg storify.com/w9M9M

Michael Sutton (Westminister College)
– with blogs, need to dev soft skills if you wish to dev a community of inquiry
– “Blogs are the way of the future”
– blogs as sds lng space
– using wordpress, set up a blog that is a collaborative lng space for students to blog as a team,
– blogs for negotiating meaning
– bandura – self regulating learners

Tools of engagement project (TOEP)
http://suny.edu/toep
– discovery lng
– prof dev
– edrs must have a ‘commitment to pedagogical quality’
– t-pack.org

Albert Sangra (asangra@uoc.edu)
– res on ‘lng ecologies’.
– 4 main pillars – 1) flexibility 2) personalisation 3) collaboration 4) informalisation
– UNESCO Chair of Ed and technology for social change
– Barron, 2004 – opportunities for learning cf learning all the time, integrative learning supported by technology

Ruth & Jan
– MOOCs are widening access, linear / sequential
– re MOOCs – difference between ‘connectivity’ and ‘connected’
– are MOOCs just cheaper lng?
– there is a difference between a ‘platform’ and ‘pedagogy’

Robert quigley (Uni of Texas)
– uses scribble.live software
– this software can be taken into a blog

Claire Hamshire
@clairehamshire
– Claire has a teaching role in the school, narrative researcher
– technology-enhanced learning ie use the video function on the ipad to capture and critique others practice
– tchg is about inspiring change
– never stop listening

Paul Cashian
– what does digital literacy mean?
– why are we doing this?
– what does a mobile lng strategy look like?
– why don’t we ask students to access the Internet/Wi-Fi from the mobile phones as the primary medium of inquiry
– we need to debate BOYD
– how can we use media to clarify the message?

Please note that these notes are the views and opinions of the author
Prof David Giles
June, 2014

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s